Acts of Judges in a Democracy

Acts of Judges in a Democracy


#roevwade
Two judgments of the US Supreme Court have raised a serious question about the role of judiciary in a democracy. If a handful of males(occasionally one or more women as well) are competent to override the popular will then what's the role of democracy? In the name of protecting the Constitution and in the name of protection of rights how can a democracy allow a few appointed persons who have no accountability for their actions  to hijak a popular will? In a democracy, justice is not a mechanical tool to protect the laws and rules  made  by some sort of popular will. Doing justice is not just like fixing some screw in a machine. Justice has wider connotations which include the betterment of human life in the deciding moments. Laws are made to ensure justice. They can never be all inclusive. At best they can be nothing more than guiding principles for ensuring justice. But in some moments the existing explanations based on parochial verbatims are so insufficient that they fail to deliver justice. And acts of justice can't be left to a few hands, even when such few are the most enlightened persons. And our experiences tell us, judges are certainly not the most enlightened persons. They are not infallible. Moments of history must be left to the public and their representatives to decide as public and their leaders are at least accountable for their acts. Here in the US can you expect any of the four judges who went against the Roe vs Wade or those who went against gun restrictions will ever be held responsible and be tried with if one or more life suffer due to their irrational decisions? We , in a democracy must not leave the acts of responsibility to  those who are not responsible to anyone for their acts.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

भारत की वर्तमान राजनीति और भविष्य के लिए चंद चर्चे।

भारत की वर्तमान राजनीति और भविष्य के लिए चंद चर्चे। जिन धर्मों में धार्मिक परम्पराओं के कारण उपवास का चलन है और दरिद्र को ईश्वर का रूप माना जाता है और इन दोनों परम्पराओं के पालन को मोक्ष अथवा ईश्वर की प्राप्ति का साधन माना जाता है उन धार्मिक समूहों में आर्थिक विकास और समानता के नाम पर लोगों को लामबंद नहीं किया जा सकता है। यही वजह है कि हिन्दू बहुल भारत और नेपाल तथा मुस्लिम बहुल राष्ट्रों में भारी गरीबी, असमानता और  उत्पीड़न मिलता है और विकास और आर्थिक वृद्धि के सवाल आम जनों को उद्वेलित नहीं कर पाते हैं।  ऐसे देशों में जनता को धार्मिक मुद्दों में उलझा देना बहुत ही सरल होता है।       आज भारत के बड़े और प्रबुद्ध मंच पर भाजपा के हिन्दू राजनीति की कठोर आलोचना होती है किंतु चुनावों में भाजपा को पराजित करना लगभग असंभव हो चुका है। इसका सीधा कारण यह है कि आम भारतीय अपने मूल स्वभाव से धार्मिक-कर्मकांडी होता है और आर्थिक समृद्धि के आगे उसे सांस्कृतिक समृद्धि , जो धार्मिकता और कर्मकाण्ड के पुरुत्थान में दिखता है से ज्यादा प्रभावित होता है। सो वह शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, रोजगार, आमद...
Read more

WE NEED DEMOCRACY

    WE NEED DEMOCRACY All schemes and services are meant to serve the people and so the beneficiaries must have every right to make complaints if there is something wrong in the structure and / or in the implementation of the schemes and services. This right to complain is not a costly privilege but it's is the right and this right is protected when the people have right to free speech and other rights as enshrined in our Constitution. The government  is chosen to provide these services and schemes for their betterment, for improving their living standard and the government has no other business more important than this to do. So the government is bound to entertain the complaints and this obligation is fulfilled only when the Constitutionally protected rights are intact. These rights can be intact and protected only if we have independent judiciary and investigative agencies. Only independent judiciary can arrive at the end of justice which includes the protection of rig...
Read more

BEYOND RT MODEL

BEYOND RT MODEL History is a playbook of fierce struggle among the state, the market and the community. There have been some rare periods of balance among them.  Present is also witnessing this fierce struggle. The state is advocating minimum.governsnce  in many parts of the world . This was also happened in past. And whenever this has happened the loser is always the community. Present is marked by failures of Reagon-Thatcher Model. Richness must have only objective and that objective is to enrich the community as a whole. The RT Model brought great richness but failed to enrich the community in the same proportion. This was due to its advocacy for minimal government. And so the RT Model has completed  it's life. This collapse is painful no doubt but beyond the curtain of economic depression social prosperity is waiting as there is no other way to keep nation states survived. If community is not brought in the center greater pain is inevitable.
Read more